Also, the ability to edit posts, and to change their visibility, and the instant propagation of these changes, so if you edit a post as someone is writing a reply, the post will change on their screen, perhaps with a little flash/beep effect, so they won't be replying to something you didn't mean to say.
Notices by 🇳🇴 Thor to the Core (thorthenorseman@octodon.social)
-
Statut de 🇳🇴 Thor to the Core (thorthenorseman@octodon.social) sur Friday, 09-Nov-2018 07:30:06 CET
🇳🇴 Thor to the Core
-
Statut de 🇳🇴 Thor to the Core (thorthenorseman@octodon.social) sur Wednesday, 07-Nov-2018 21:31:26 CET
🇳🇴 Thor to the Core
@MatejLach @marsxyz @erosdiscordia No, but one thing you do see the European right wingers do a fair bit is try to privatise the health sector, or to cut the budgets. There's this idea that you can get health services cheaper if there's free market competition, and then you can cut taxes. I mean, it's the typical right winger thing…
-
Statut de 🇳🇴 Thor to the Core (thorthenorseman@octodon.social) sur Friday, 02-Nov-2018 17:25:07 CET
🇳🇴 Thor to the Core
If there was a social network where old content fading away was an explicit feature, I'd be interested in that. Snapchat pretty much started out as a social network where two of the main features were intimacy (posts are only shared to the people you pick) and the non-permanence of shared content (snaps could only be viewed momentarily and would then disappear). People found ways around that, but it at least didn't encourage the keeping of records.
-
Statut de 🇳🇴 Thor to the Core (thorthenorseman@octodon.social) sur Saturday, 08-Sep-2018 08:36:14 CEST
🇳🇴 Thor to the Core
Moore's law really only applied between 1986 and 2003. It kept going for nearly 20 years. I thought that this year's computer would always be significantly more sophisticated than last year's computer, because again, when something happens for 10, 15, 20 years, you tend to assume that it's permanent.